The Boot Stamping Continues…

If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.

– George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four

You might remember this post from a couple of weeks ago, where I railed against the Department of Homeland Security’s new policy that allows them to seize laptops, iPods, and other electronic devices from anyone entering the United States. You don’t have to be a “filthy foreigner”, a suspect in a crime, or even on the incredibly accurate “no-fly” list. You just have to piss off the wrong DHS agent on the wrong day.

Now there’s word that the federal government is tracking the border crossings of US citizens. Oh, they promise that they won’t do any mining of the data… and you believe that, right? Customs and Border Protection even says that they’ll keep the information in their database… for 15 years! And this is data which the DHS readily admits that it will share with other federal agencies, as well as state and local governments.

The saddest thing about all this (to me) is that this is the same federal government that has for years refused to defend the borders of the United States, a task which is one of the basic jobs of any national government. Almost every single right-wing commentator on TV and radio has demanded only that the government simply enforce existing immigration laws. Despite this, the government has turned a blind eye to the millions of Mexicans coming into this country, while it (now) steadily takes away the fundamental freedoms of Americans. So it seems that any terrorist could simply enter Mexico and cross the border scot-free at almost any point… but an American returning from any foreign country now gets their name in a database for 15 years. Yeah, because that make sense!

Again, let me ask: when is the Second American Revolution coming?

Veronica Mars: The Movie?

Fans of the late, great Veronica Mars… prepare to pee in your pants!

Word on the Intarwebs is that series creator Rob Thomas and Kristin Bell got together last week for some “serious discussions” about bringing our favorite teenage supersleuth to the silver screen. Word on the street – and this is very preliminary – says that the movie might be based on the “Veronica Joins the FBI” trailer\teaser that Thomas put together for the folks at The CW for a 4th season of the show… which, of course, never happened. The teaser is available on the Season 3 DVD set. You can also watch part 1 of the “FBI Trailer” on YouTube here; watch part 2 here.

Could it really happen? Let’s hope so! If crap shows like The Dukes of Hazzard can get made into movies, why not a show that Buffy creator Joss Whedon called “The. Best. Show. Ever. Seriously, I’ve never gotten more wrapped up in a show I wasn’t making, and maybe even more than those… These guys know what they’re doing on a level that intimidates me”. Kevin Smith (of Clerks fame) said that “Veronica Mars is, hands-down, the best show on television right now, and proof that TV can be far better than cinema. Some of the best TV ever produced”. Stephen King called it “Nancy Drew meets Philip Marlowe, and the result is pure nitro. Why is Veronica Mars so good? It bears little resemblance to life as I know it, but I can’t take my eyes off the damn thing.” And comic book legend Ed Brubaker called it “The best mystery show ever made in America.”

LONG LIVE VERONICA MARS!

ADV Parishes Win Again!

From the Anglican District of Virginia’s site:

The 11 Virginia Anglican congregations sued by The Episcopal Church (TEC) and the Diocese of Virginia responded to the Fairfax County Circuit Court ruling issued today concerning the Contracts Clause and the assertion by [The Episcopal Church] and the Diocese that the 11 Anglican congregations waived their right to invoke the Virginia Division Statute.

Judge Randy Bellows ruled that TEC and the Diocese failed to timely assert their claim that the 11 Anglican congregations contracted around or waived their right to invoke the Division Statute. In addition, the judged ruled that the Division Statute does not violate the contracts clause provisions of the U.S. and Virginia Constitutions as applied to these properties. The rulings can be found at www.anglicandistrictofvirginia.org. Today’s rulings mean that there are only a small number of issues remaining to be decided at the October trial, and the 11 Anglican congregations are hopeful that they can be resolved quickly.

And from Stand Firm:

Contracts Clause Opinion – The judge rules that the Division Statute 57-9 does not violate the contracts clause provisions of the U.S. and Virginia Constitutions.

Waver Opinion – Judge rules that TEC/DioVA failed to assert in a timely manner their claim that the CANA Congregations contracted around or waived their right to invoke the Virginia Div. statute.

This opinion denies TEC/DioVA their earlier answers to questions regarding 57-9 (they wanted to change their strategy now that they’ve lost on all the rulings so far; that change of strategy was denied). The judge also orders the counsel into court this Friday to discuss the scope of the October trial.

So… TEC\DioVA are what… 0-12 on this case so far? How much money is TEC going to waste on this instead of concentrating on the “issues” like world poverty that KJS and her jackbotts whined so much about at Lambeth?

Mad Men: “Three Sundays”

This week’s episode of Mad Men takes place over three Sundays: Passion Sunday, Palm Sunday and Easter Sunday, 1962.

We begin with a hungover Peggy attending Mass with her family at their Brooklyn church. After a few moments, Peggy decides that she needs some fresh air, and so she excuses herself. As she approaches the door of the church, she runs into a visiting priest, Father Gill. The two have a brief (but meaningful) conversation, and Father Gill says that he’ll be eating lunch at Peggy’s sister’s place that afternoon. At lunch, Father Gill, who has lived in Rome, impresses the ladies with tales of the Vatican. Father Gill and Peggy have some sort of “spark” between them, and when Peggy says that she needs to go, Father Gill excuses himself in order to give Peggy a ride to the subway station. In the car outside the station, Father Gill picks Peggy’s brain for “marketing ideas” for his sermon the following week.

While all this is going on, Don has convinced Betty to skip out on a barbecue by getting frisky with her. Unfortunately, the kids interrupt them, and so the two end up spending a lazy Sunday on the sofa, enjoying drinks made by Sally, the family’s 8 year-old bartender. (I like Sally’s version of the Bloody Mary: 90% vodka, 10% tomato juice, and nothing else). Don and Betty later dance to a Bing Crosby song that Betty loves.

After a brief respite, the sin returns in full force on Monday. Pete and Ken have hired Vicky, a high-end call girl, to entertain a client. Roger stops by the table, and Vicky is (awkwardly) introduced as the client’s wife. Meanwhile, Bobbie Barrett goes to see Don at his office, with plans for a Candid Camera style show starring her husband, tentatively called Grin and Barrett. Last week, I said that I thought that Bobbie and Don didn’t do anything in the car; that illusion was shattered this week when Bobbie locked the door to Don’s office and threw her coat on the floor… presumably to keep her knees from getting dirty.

On the following Sunday, Don gets an emergency phone call from Duck: it seems that the American Airlines meeting has been moved up to the upcoming Friday, and Don’s needed in the office now.. Betty had stepped out of the kitchen moments before the phone rang, and while Don was on the phone, Bobby burned himself on the pancake griddle. Earlier in the week, Bobby also broke the record player, and there’s serious tension between Don and Betty over “who wears the pants” when it comes to disciplining the children. Betty, in a rage, takes Bobby to the emergency room, leaving Don to take Sally to the office.

Continue reading “Mad Men: “Three Sundays””

“Isn’t That Illegal?”

I was sifting through my RSS feeds the other day when I came across this story at Consumerist.com, which talks about how Alaska Airlines will no longer accept cash as a form of payment for in-flight services, such as drinks, headphones, etc.

As it happens with every single article about forms of payment, someone in the comments section of the article asked “Isn’t it illegal not to accept cash?”

The short answer: no.

A merchant can set any rules they want as far as accepting payment goes. He can accept cash only. He can accept credit cards only. He can accept cash and credit cards. He can accept cash and Mastercard only, or cash and Visa only. He could even accept “live chickens only” as his sole form of payment, if he were so inclined.

What he cannot do is refuse cash as a form of payment for a debt, then take you to court over non-payment of the debt. If, for example, a local convenience store offered to set up a “tab” for you, then refused to take a cash payment for that tab at the end of the month, he cannot take you to court over non-payment. That’s what “legal tender” means: payment that, by law, cannot be refused in settlement of a debt. And a “sale” is not a “debt”, so yes: the merchant can absolutely refuse your cash. Or he can refuse large bills. Or he can refuse pennies.

And while we’re on the topic of credit cards and money, here are a few issues you might encounter with credit cards that may or may not be “illegal”:

Merchants requiring minimums for credit card use: According to the agreement signed between a merchant and Visa or Mastercard, the merchant cannot have a “minimum charge” policy. You might have seen signs posted in bars and take-out restaurants saying “$10 minimum charge for credit cards”. This is a blatant violation of the merchant agreement; click here to learn how to report merchants who violate this rule to Visa, Mastercard and American Express.

Merchants charging more for credit cards: According to the merchant agreement, stores cannot charge more for using a Visa, Mastercard or American Express. You might have seen signs in stores that say “3% surcharge for using credit card”. This too is a blatant violation of the merchant agreement. What merchants can do is give a “cash discount” for purchases, but this discount may apply to cash payments only; checks, gift cards, etc. do not count as “cash” in this example.

Continue reading ““Isn’t That Illegal?””

Good News for DM Fans!

A couple of years ago, I asked for a pair of STEEL brand boots for Christmas. This came as something of a shock to my family, as I’d worn Doc Martens shoes and boots nearly exclusively for almost 22 years.

The truth be told, the last two pairs of Docs I bought started falling apart in less than a year. In one case, the soles actually started splitting where they’d bend as I walked. In the second case, the reinforcements around the eyelets started falling off.

Contrast this to the second pair of Docs I ever owned: a pair of plain black 3-hole Oxfords. I bought those shoes at Abbadabbas in Little Five Points shortly after graduating high school and wore them almost every single day for nine years. I only ended up throwing them away because all of the leather inside of the shoe had worn off, and the sole was so thin that the “air sole” bits were starting to stick out. Sure, I paid around $130 for them back in 1989, but I probably wore them over 3,000 times. I wore them to work at my Dad’s warehouse every day. I wore them the entire time I was in college. I even wore them to several jobs after graduation. It was the best damn $130 I ever spent!

So anyway, I chalked up Doc Martens decline in quality to the fact that the company ceased manufacturing its shoes in England in 2001 and outsourced their manufacture to China and Thailand. Imagine my joy when I found out the other day that Doc Martens started making shoes in the UK again in late 2007!

The “British Doc Martens” shoes are sold under the “Vintage Originals” product line and are made from “scratch” at the Cobbs Lane Factory in Wollaston. This isn’t a case where all the parts are made in China and assembled in England… the entire shoe is made in the UK to Doc Martens’ original specifications.

I think I just might add a new pair of 3-hole Oxfords to my Christmas List!

Check it out at Doc Martens’ official site here.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY MADONNA!!

Can you believe that the Material Girl turns 50 freakin’ years old today? Me neither. Gawd, I’m getting old. Just the other day, I realized that if I still had my first pair of Doc Martens, we could go out for a drink together, since they’d be almost 22 years old. Sigh.

Anyway… HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MADONNA! I’m still crazy about you after all these years!

PS – I hope your ankle gets better soon!

Using Weave On Your Server

Google Browser Sync was an awesome tool that automatically synchronized your Firefox bookmarks, passwords, autocomplete information, and even your tabs between multiple computers. So if you installed Browser Sync on your work and home computers, you could close your browser at the office, then come home to the exact same experience – the same bookmarks, the same open tabs, same saved passwords, etc.

Sadly, Google announced that Browser Sync would not be updated for Firefox 3.0. So the Mozilla Foundation announced that they were rolling out Weave, a Firefox plug-in that would do all that Browser Sync did (and more, some day in the future). Although Weave is still very much in beta mode, it promises to be great one day. If you have any need for a browser synchronization tool, Weave’s where it’s at these days.

A few days ago, a guy named Marios Tziortzis posted this article on his blog about setting up Weave on any WebDAV-enabled webserver. So if you have your own website, you can set Weave up to sync to your server instead of Mozilla’s servers, which frequently go down for testing or maintenance.

Now, one of my “commandments” for running this site is that I always test out everything I recommend here. Most of the time, if I say that “[program name] works great!”, it’s because I use it at home and have tested it in detail here at home, not only on my own computer, but on virtual computers and test machines, too.

In the case of installing Weave on my own server, I haven’t quite figured it out yet. It seems that WordPress and WebDAV don’t get along that well, and much of the follow-up advice Marios offers in the comments section of his post is a bit over my head (for example, for the life of me, I can’t figure out how to change the WebDAV login type to “AuthType Basic” from “AuthType Digest” using my host’s control panel).

Still, many others have had success with this, so it’s worth checking out if you want to sync up to your own webserver.

Cool Mad Men Sites

I know that some of you might be sick of all the talk about Mad Men, but I just wanted to let you guys know about two cool Mad Men websites.

The first is AMC’s official Mad Men site. Yes, it’s an official site owned and operated by AMC, but there’s lots of great stuff at there, like blogs, trivia games, episode guides and a lot more. The Mad Men blog is especially interesting, as it contains not only interviews with cast and crew members, but also the “1960s Handbook”, which focuses on background information about many of the places, objects and companies featured on the show. The site is, in my opinion, great, and if you like the show, it’s absolutely worth a visit.

The second site is a bit silly, yet thought-provoking at the same time. It’s called What Would Don Draper Do? and it features “questions” that people allegedly send in to the site, which “Don” answers. Think of it like “Dear Abby”, only run by a hard-livin’ guy from the 1960s. There are also lots of free-form quotes inspired by things Don says on the actual show. The funny thing is, the quotes tend to come across sounding a bit like fortune cookies… like “Don’t be cruel unless it serves both parties equally” or “Don’t fight. Say whatever she thinks you should” or (my personal favorite) “Teach your eight-year-old daughter to bartend”.

Both sites have RSS feeds, too… so you don’t need to check them all the time.

Lavonia Rocks!

As someone that’s driven from Charlotte to Atlanta (or vice versa) dozens of times, I’ve often been… intrigued by the dozens of billboards for Café Risque, a restaurant\strip club in the small town of Lavonia, Georgia. I guess this is because I have some kind of morbid curiosity about the place. Why do they have 30 billboards on each side of I-85 advertising the place? What kind of girls work at a strip club in Lavonia? Do they have all their teeth? What kind of food does a Lavonia-based strip club have on its buffet? Is it safe to eat?

In a way, it’s similar to the curiosity I used to have as a child about the “alligator farms” advertised along the interstates in northern Florida. I remember begging my mom to stop at one of those farms on several car trips to the Sunshine State. But she never would.

And it seems that I’ll never get my chance to visit Café Risque, either: the city of Lavonia purchased Café Risque in late July for $997,000, and plans to convert the property to a family-friendly restaurant.

You might not think the story of a strip club in a tiny Georgia town would be that interesting, but the tale of Café Risque is actually chock full of intrigue.

Back in 2001, a man named Jerry Sullivan approached city officials about building a family restaurant at the site. Sullivan told the city council that he was “building a Cracker Barrel-type restaurant, and [the restaurant would] make the best tomato gravy in the world”. He further told the council that the restaurant would be called “Skeeter’s Big Biscuits”. Sullivan then gave city officials a tour of the restaurant, which was in the final stages of construction. After the city council approved Sullivan’s business license, the smut peddler immediately set to work removing the booths, replacing the lunch counter with a bar, and even bricking up the windows. By 5am the morning after he got his business license, Sullivan had Café Risque open for business.

As you might guess, this infuriated city officials. They were, however, powerless to stop him, as the city had never passed any sort of law regulating adult entertainment venues, because (quite frankly) the issue had never come up before. The city launched a series of expensive lawsuits against Sullivan, which they almost always lost due to First Amendment concerns. In 2003, the city sued Sullivan again, and this time he agreed to stop selling alcohol… if the city would allow more nudity (which they grudgingly agreed to). In 2006, Café Risque was raided by local police, who seized a number of illegal poker machines. Sullivan sued the city, saying that the action violated his agreement with the city, which banned police officers from coming onto Sullivan’s property for any reason (QUESTION: how can I get that kind of deal?)

Jerry Sullivan died in 2006, but the club continued to operate. Earlier this year, a third-party informed the city that he had been approached by the mysterious new owners of the club, who were interested in selling. In complete secrecy, the city quietly used its emergency fund to pay off a bond issue (which saved the city $1.2 million in interest payments); the third party (a local bank) then lent the city the money to buy the club. In late July, Lavonia mayor Ralph Owens announced that “the city was offered a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to get rid of a very undesirable business in Lavonia. The transaction has now been finalized, and we can make history for our city. By purchasing the Café Risque property, the city can now rid itself of that terrible business and the awful billboard blight”. This set off a round of celebration from the crowd, who followed the mayor to the Café Risque site, where all the signage was taken down from the building and set alight in a huge bonfire.

And thus, Café Risque ceased to exist. There remains only one question in my mind, though: what reason do I ever have to visit Lavonia now?